Adhesion of bacterial cells on carbon supports: characteristics of process and application in biotechnology

Authors

  • Yu.G. Maksimova Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms UB RAS
  • A.Yu. Maksimov Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms UB RAS
  • V.A. Demakov Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms UB RAS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7242/2658-705X/2019.3.9

Keywords:

bacterial adhesion, biofilms, carbon materials, immobilization of microbial cells, hydrophobicity, profilometry, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray energy dispersive microanalysis

Abstract

The article provides a brief review of methods for studying the process of adhesion of bacterial cells on insoluble abiotic carriers (carbon materials). Determination of the hydrophobicity of microbial cells and the carrier, dispersion, surface roughness of the carrier allows to identify the main patterns of bacterial adhesion on carbon adsorbents. It is shown that the adhered biomass on a hydrophobic carrier is the greater, the higher the hydrophobicity of the cell surface. Correlation analysis showed no reliable relationship between surface roughness, hydrophobicity and dispersion of carriers on the one hand, and the mass of adhered cells on the other hand when considering these characteristics separately, which indicates the need for a comprehensive approach to the assessment of the carrier for immobilizing microbial cells. The mass (amount) of adsorbed cells depends on their concentration in the suspension. The nature of adsorption, subsequently replaced by adhesion, can be described either by the theory of polymolecular adsorption of Brunauer, Emmett, Teller, which implies the formation of a cells polylayer on the surface, or in the case of carrier saturation with cells, the graphs look like Langmuir isotherms. The elemental composition of the carrier has a certain effect on the physiological state of the adhered cells, therefore, it must be taken into account when choosing the optimal carrier of cells in heterogeneous biocatalysis. Scanning electron microscopy allows visualization of adherent cells. Adherent cells of nitrile-hydrolyzing bacteria can be used as biocatalysts for the process of enzymatic transformation of nitriles and amides or in the process of treatment of environment from these toxic substances.

Supporting Agencies
Работа выполнена в рамках государственного задания, номер госрегистрации темы № 01201353249 «Молекулярные механизмы адаптации микроорганизмов к факторам среды».

Author Biographies

  • Yu.G. Maksimova, Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms UB RAS

    доктор биологических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник лаборатории молекулярной микробиологии и биотехнологии, Институт экологии и генетики микроорганизмов УрО РАН - филиал Пермского федерального исследовательского центра УрО РАН (ИЭГМ УрО РАН)

  • A.Yu. Maksimov, Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms UB RAS
    кандидат биологических наук, старший научный сотрудник лаборатории молекулярной микробиологии и биотехнологии, ИЭГМ УрО РАН
  • V.A. Demakov, Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms UB RAS
    доктор медицинских наук, профессор, член-корреспондент РАН, заведующий лабораторией молекулярной микробиологии и биотехнологии, директор ИЭГМ УрО РАН

References

  1. Maksimov A.U., Maksimova U.G., Kuznecova M.V., Oloncev V.F., Demakov V.A. Immobilizacia na uglerodnyh sorbentah kletok stamma Rhodococcus ruber gtl, obladausego nitrilgidrataznoj aktivnost’u // Prikladnaa biohimia i mikrobiologia. - T. 43. - No 2. - 2007. - S. 193-198.
  2. Maksimova U.G., Kovalenko G.A., Maksimov A.U., Demakov V.A., Cuenko T.V., Rudina N.A. Immobilizovannye nerastusie kletki Rhodococcus ruber kak geterogennye biokatalizatory dla processa gidratacii akrilonitrila v akrilamid // Kataliz v promyslennosti. - 2008. - No 1. - S. 44-50.
  3. Maksimova U.G., Maksimov A.U., Demakov V.A., Kozlov S.V., Oveckina G.V., Oloncev V.F. Gidroliz akrilonitrila kletkami nitrilkonvertiruusih bakterij, immobilizovannymi na voloknistyh uglerodnyh adsorbentah // Biotehnologia. - 2010. - No 4. - S. 51-58.
  4. Maksimova U.G., Gorbunova A.N., Demakov V.A. Stereoselektivnaa biotransformacia fenilglicinnitrila geterogennym biokatalizatorom na osnove immobilizovannyh bakterial’nyh kletok i fermentnogo preparata // Doklady akademii nauk. - 2017. - T. 474. - No 2. - S. 248-250.
  5. Nikolaev U.A., Plakunov V.K. Bioplenka - <> ili analog mnogokletocnogo organizma? // Mikrobiologia. - 2007. - T. 76. - No 2. - S. 149-163.
  6. Nozevnikova A.N., Bockova E.A., Plakunov V.K. Mul’tividovye bioplenki v ekologii, medicine i biotehnologii // Mikrobiologia. - 2015. - T. 84. - No 6. - S. 623-644.
  7. Sirotkin A.S., Saginurova G.I., Ippolitov K.G. Agregacia mikroorganizmov: flokuly, bioplenki, mikrobnye granuly. - Kazan’: izd-vo <> AN RT, 2007. - 160 s.
  8. Halan B., Buehler K., Schmid A. Biofilms as living catalysts in continuous chemical syntheses // Trends Biotechnol. - 2012. - Vol. 30(9). - P. 453-465.
  9. Gross R., Hauer B., Otto K., Schmid A. Microbial biofilms: new catalysts for maximizing productivity of long-term biotransformations // Biotechnol Bioeng. - 2007. - Vol. 98. - No 6. - P. 1123-1134.
  10. Kovalenko G.A., Kuznetsova E.V., Mogilnykh Yu.I., Andreeva I.S., Kuvshinov D.G., Rudina N.A. Catalytic filamentous carbons for immobilization of biologically active substances and non-growing bacterial cells // Carbon. - 2001. - Vol. 39. - P. 1033-1043.
  11. Rosche B., Li X.Z., Hauer B., Schmid A., Buehler K. Microbial biofilms: a concept for industrial catalysis? // Trends Biotechnol. - 2009. - Vol. 27. - No 11. - P. 636-643.
  12. Rosenberg M., Gutnik D., Rosenberg E. Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell surface hydrophobicity // FEMS Microbiol. Lett. - 1980. - Vol. 9. - P. 29-33.

Published

2019-10-14

Issue

Section

Research: theory and experiment

How to Cite

Maksimova, Y. ., Maksimov, A. ., & Demakov, V. . (2019). Adhesion of bacterial cells on carbon supports: characteristics of process and application in biotechnology. Perm Federal Research Centre Journal, 3, 86-93. https://doi.org/10.7242/2658-705X/2019.3.9