Ethnic groups’ spatial localization as a voting factor in national republics of the Russian Federation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7242/2658-705X/2019.2.6Keywords:
national republics, elections, ethnicity, titular group, spatial localizationAbstract
Although «national republics» are identified as a special category of RF units, they demonstrate very high variability of voting in federal elections. In this case, the voting that is loyal to the ruling party is connected not with the «republican status» as it is, but with the ethnic structure of the population in the republics because «ethnic networks» are an important resource used by political machines for electoral mobilization. At the same time, «ethnic networks» are not just high proportion of representatives of an ethnic group in the territory population. An important factor influencing the formation of «ethnic networks» is the format of the spatial localization of ethnic groups. When members of an ethnic group are«segregated», i.e., live separately from members of other ethnic groups, they have a much better chance of sufficiently close social ties and intensive ethnic identities, which can become an instrument of electoral mobilization. This hypothesis has been tested on the empirical data of the State Duma elections in 2007, 2011 and 2016 in national republics. The analysis confirmed that segregation as a special format of spatial localization has a significant influence on the effect of the impact of the titular group proportion in the population of national republics on voting for United Russia.
References
- Balansirua pritazania: etniceskie regional’nye avtonomii, celostnost’ gosudarstva i prava etniceskih men’sinstv / pod red. P.V. Panova. - M.: Polit. enciklopedia, 2017. - 214 s.
- Kusner P.I. Etniceskie territorii i etniceskie granicy. - M.: Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1951. - 279 s.
- Minaeva E.U. Territorial’noe izmerenie segmentacii politiceskogo prostranstva na osnove kartograficeskih proekcij v ArcGIS // Cifrovaa gumanitaristika: resursy, metody, issledovania: materialy mezdunar. nauc. konf. - Perm’: Perm. gos. nac. issled. un-t, 2017. - S. 44-48.
- Frye T., Reuter O.J., Szakonyi D. Political Machines at Work Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace // World Politics. - 2014. - Vol. 66. - No 2. - P. 195-228.
- Golosov G. Machine Politics: The Concept and Its Implications for Post-Soviet Studies // Demokratizatsiya. - 2013. - Vol. 21. - No 4. - P. 459-480.
- Hale H. Explaining Machine Politics in Russia’s Regions: Economy, Ethnicity, and Legacy // Post-Soviet Affairs. - 2003. - Vol. 19. - No 3. - P. 228-263.
- Panov P., Ross C. Explanatory Factors for Electoral Turnout in the Russian Federation: The Regional Dimension // Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. - 2016. - Vol. 24. - No 3. P. 351-370.
- Panov P., Ross C. The dynamic nationalisation of voting for United Russia: the stability / instability of regional deviations from national results // East European Politics. - 2018. - Vol. 34. - No 1. - P. 97-114.
- Panov P., Ross C. Volatility in Electoral Support for United Russia: Cross-Regional Variations in Putin’s Electoral Authoritarian Regime // Europe-Asia Studies. - 2019. - Vol. 71. - No 2. - P. 268-289.
- Scott J. Corruption, Machine Politics, and Political Change // The American Political Science Review. - 1969. - Vol. 63. - No 4. - P. 1142-1158.
- Stokes S. Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics // American Political Science Review. - 2005. - Vol. 99. - No 3. - P. 315-325.
- Weidmann N., Rod J., Cederman L.-E. Representing Ethnic Groups in Space: A New Dataset // Journal of Peace Research. - 2010. - No 4. - P. 491-499.
- Wucherpfennig J., Weidmann N., Girardin L., Cederman L.-E., Wimmer A. Politically Relevant Ethnic Groups across Space and Time: Introducing the GeoEPR Dataset // Conflict Management and Peace Science. - 2011. - No 5. - P. 423-37.