New "Hungarian complex" from the excavationsof the Rozhdestvenskoye burial ground
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7242/1998-2097/2017.4.14Keywords:
the Middle Ages, Perm region, Rozhdestvenskoye burial ground, cenotaph, armament complex of the "Hungarian type"Abstract
In 2017 a symbolic burial ground (a cenotaph) was found for the first time in Perm region at the Rozhdestvenskoye burial ground. The cenotaph contained a set of precious possessions of a status character: the only saber with a silver pommel on the hilt, a battle axe and other armaments, a silver trapezoidal suspension, a fire striker with a bronze handle, a rich belt set, a funerary mask and other things. The burial ground is a cenotaph, as indicated by the fact that the most valuable things, including the funerary mask, were wrapped in a bundle, tied with a waist belt that was located in the centre of a usual grave pit. All the items of the funeral equipment were deliberately broken, in what appears to be the ritual of "killing" things typical of the Finno-Ugric peoples. The silver objects presented in the complex are stylistically similar to the Hungarian ones, but as far as the technological characteristics are concerned, they gravitate towards the Prikamye jewelry school. They might have been made according to the Hungarian models. The military complex of the "Hungarian type", typical of rich druzhina (fellowship) burial grounds of the Perm Cis-Urals, evidently belonged to a man-soldier who died elsewhere, a representative of the social elite.
References
The Ancient Hungarians. - Budapest: Hungarian National Museum, 1996. - 480 p.
Belavin A.M. Kamskij torgovyj put’. Srednevekovoe Predural’e v ego ekonomiceskih i etnokul’turnyh svazah. - Perm’: PGPU, 2000. - 200 s.
Belavin A.M., Krylasova N.B. Pogrebal’nye licevye pokrytia kak ugorskij marker // Mezdu proslym i budusim: istoriceskij opyt nacional’nogo razvitia: Materialy Vseros. nauc. konf., posv. 20-letiu IIiA UrO RAN. - Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN, 2008. - S. 47-51.
Belavin A.M., Ivanov V.A., Krylasova N.B. Ugry Predural’a v drevnosti i srednie veka. - Ufa: IPK BGPU <>, 2009. - 285 s.
Gordienko A.V. Strana medveda // Hanty-Mansijskij avtonomnyj okrug v zerkale proslogo: sb. statej. - Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta, 2007. - Vyp. 5. - S. 46-57.
Danic A.V. Klinkovoe oruzie Permskogo Predural’a // Povolzskaa arheologia. - 2012. - No 2. - S. 86-106.
Kirpicnikov A.N. Drevnerusskoe oruzie. Meci i sabli IX-XIII vv. // Svod arheologiceskih istocnikov. Vyp. E1-36. - M.-L.: Nauka, 1966. - 164 s.
Kosarev M.F. Osnovy azyceskogo miroponimania. - M.: <>, 2003. - 350 s.
Krylasova N.B. Arheologia povsednevnosti. Material’naa kul’tura srednevekovogo Predural’a. - Perm’: PGPU, 2007. - 352 s.
Kul’tura Bilara. Bulgarskie orudia truda i oruzie X-XIII vv. - M.: Nauka, 1985. - 216 s.
Morahina K.V. Perstni-<> s territorii Permskogo Predural’a // Trudy Kamskoj arheologo-etnograficeskoj ekspedicii. - Perm’: PGGPU, 2015. - Vyp. H. - S. 163-167.
Nikitina T.B. Marijcy v epohu srednevekov’a. - Joskar-Ola: MarNII, 2002. - 432 s.
Nikitina T.B., Vorob’eva E.E., Fedulov M.I. Ukrasenia Anatkasinskogo mogil’nika (o kul’turnoj prinadleznosti pamatnika) // Povolzskaa arheologia. - 2016. - No 1(15). - S. 212-142.
Putesestvie Ibn Fadlana: Volzskij put’ ot Bagdada do Bulgara. Katalog vystavki. - M.: Izd. dom Mardzani, 2016. - No 305. Trapecievidnaa podveska (K.A. Rudenko).