Numerical model of crack growth in hydraulic re-fracturing

Authors

  • Oleg Yurievich Smetannikov Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation
  • Yuriy Aleksandrovich Kashnikov Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation
  • Sergey Gennadievich Ashihmin Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation
  • Denis Vladimirovich Shustov Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7242/1999-6691/2015.8.2.18

Keywords:

geomechanics, hydraulic re-fracturing, secondary crack, finite element method, remeshing

Abstract

Crack propagation simulations with FEM employ remeshing to provide more accurate results. This raises a question about the direction and criterion of mesh modification. In the case of general-purpose CAE-packages, we have to deal with a stationary mesh, and the crack trajectory is usually represented as a chain of elements with degraded properties. The accuracy of the solution is heavily dependent on the choice of mesh topology, the degree of mesh refinement in the unpredictable crack propagation zone, and correct crack surface loading in this case is impossible. The algorithm proposed in this paper is based on the ANSYS Mechanical APDL language for stepwise geometry reconstruction and mesh modification in accordance with the current configuration of a growing crack and assures a more accurate description of its shape. The crack propagation process is divided into stages. Each subsequent stage differs from the previous one by the crack shape modified due to the crack length increment in the calculated direction, and the linear stationary boundary value problem of elasticity is solved under the assumption of small deformations. To check the adequacy of the model, an experiment on crack propagation in glass samples with an initial cutoff under uniaxial compression has been performed. Samples of size 200×100 mm with a 2.5×40 mm central cutout at an angle of 30 ° to the horizontal axis are made from 4 mm thick window glass. Vertical loading is increased until the crack passes through the sample. The relative difference between the calculated and experimental crack paths does not exceed 5%. The numerical model developed is used to solve the problem of secondary crack growth for different values of stress field anisotropy in the oil ground layer. The factors of crack propagation re-fracturing along the normal to the crack primary gap are defined: 1) stress anisotropy ratio> 0.8; 2) growth of discharge pressure; 3) increase of primary crack disclosure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Latypov I.D., Borisov G.A., Hajdar A.M., Gorin A.N., Nikitin A.N., Kardymon D.V. Pereorientacia azimuta tresiny povtornogo gidrorazryva plasta na mestorozdeniah OOO <> // Neftanoe hozajstvo. - 2011. - No 6. - S. 34-38.
2. Latypov I.D., Fedorov A.I., Nikitin A.A. Issledovanie avlenia pereorientacii azimuta tresiny povtornogo GRP // Neftanoe hozajstvo. - 2013. - No 10. - S. 74-78.
3. Wright C.A., Conant R.A., Stewart D.E. Emanuel M.A., Wright W.W. Reorientation of propped refracture treatments // SPE paper 28078 presented at the 1994 SPE / ISMR Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering Conference, Delft, Aug. 29-31.
4. Lan Zh., Zhang G., SPE, Hou F., He X., Liu X. Evaluation of refracture reorientation in both laboratory and field scales // SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, 13-15 February, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA. - SPE-112445-MS. DOI
5. Parton V.Z., Morozov E.M. Mehanika uprugoplasticeskogo razrusenia.- M.: Nauka, 1985. - 504 s.
6. Fadeev A.B. Metod konecnyh elementov v geomehanike. - M.: Nedra, 1987. - 224 s.
7. Zubkov V.V., Koselev V.F., Lin’kov A.M. Cislennoe modelirovanie iniciirovania i rosta tresin gidrorazryva // FTPRPI.- 2007. - No 1. - S. 45-63. DOI
8. Timbrell C., Maligno A., Stevens D. Simulation of complex 3D non-planar crack propagation using robust adaptive re-meshing and radial basis functions. (URL: http://www.zentech.co.uk/download/zentech-blos-nwc13.pdf).
9. Kramberger J., Flasker J. Numerical simulation of 3-D crack growth in thin-rim gears. (URL: http://www.gruppofrattura.it/ocs/index.php/esis/CP2006/paper/viewFile/9516/6139).
10. Korolev I.K., Petinov S.V., Frejdin A.B. Cislennoe modelirovanie nakoplenia povrezdenij i razvitia ustalostnoj tresiny v uprugih materialah // Vycisl. meh. splos. sred. - 2009. - T. 2, No 3. - S. 34-43. DOI
11. Perkins T.K., Kern L.R. Widths of hydraulic fractures // J. Petrol. Technol. - 1961. - Vol. 13, no. 9. - P. 937-949. DOI
12. Nordgren R.P. Propagation of a vertical hydraulic fracture // Soc. Petrol. Eng. J. - 1972. - Vol. 12, no. 4. - P. 306-314. DOI
13. Ekonomides M., Olini R., Val’ko P. Unificirovannyj dizajn gidrorazryva plasta: ot teorii k praktike. - Moskva-Izevsk: Institut komp’uternyh tehnologij, 2007. - 237 s.
14. Hoek E. Rock fracture under static stress conditions. PhD Thesis in Philosophy and Engineering. - The Faculty of Engineering of the University of Cape Town, 1965. - 229 p.

Published

2015-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Smetannikov, O. Y., Kashnikov, Y. A., Ashihmin, S. G., & Shustov, D. V. (2015). Numerical model of crack growth in hydraulic re-fracturing. Computational Continuum Mechanics, 8(2), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.7242/1999-6691/2015.8.2.18