Comparison of the optimal water-alternating-gas injection strategies using 1-D and 2-D reservoir simulations

Authors

  • Anna Igorevna Andreeva Institute of Mechanics of Moscow State University; Department of Mathematics and Mechanics of Moscow State University
  • Andrey Aleksandrovich Afanasyev Institute of Mechanics of Moscow State University; Department of Mathematics and Mechanics of Moscow State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7242/1999-6691/2022.15.3.19

Keywords:

flow in porous media, CO2 flooding, enhanced oil recovery, optimization, decarbonization, сompositional modeling

Abstract

Emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, in particular, carbon dioxide (CO2), are an urgent environmental problem. Today, the technology of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in oil reservoirs is proposed as a solution to this problem. This can not only assist with decarbonization of the near-Earth space, but also contributes to an increase in oil recovery. Since CO2 is part of the gases that accompany oil production, the release of the associated petroleum gases is unacceptable and their burning is harmful to the environment. Thus, gas injection is more environmentally and economically beneficial. In this work, we compare the optimal strategies of CO2 flooding into oil reservoirs within the framework of 1-D and 2-D compositional modeling. The optimization criterion is the maximization of economic profit, i.e. the Net Present Value (NPV). For different injection strategies we determine the injected volume of gas and water, at which NPV is maximum. We also consider an alternative optimization criterion, which is based on retaining the maximum volume of CO2 in the oil reservoir. The grid convergence of the 2-D numerical solution is studied. The results of the simulation demonstrate that the optimal strategies obtained by 1-D simulations qualitatively agree with those obtained by the 2-D simulations, which makes it possible to consider a 1-D modeling appropriate in determining optimal strategies for dispersed injection of water and gas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Supporting Agencies
Работа выполнена при финансовой поддержке РФФИ (проект № 20-31-80009).

Author Biography

  • Anna Igorevna Andreeva, Institute of Mechanics of Moscow State University; Department of Mathematics and Mechanics of Moscow State University

    студ.

References

Il’ina G.F., Altunina L.K. Metody i tekhnologii povysheniya nefteotdachi dlya kollektorov Zapadnoy Sibiri [Methods and technologies of enhanced oil recovery for reservoirs in Western Siberia]. Tomsk: TPU Publishing House, 2006. 166 p.

Christensen J.R., Stenby E.H., Skauge A. Review of WAG field experience. SPE Res. Eval. Eng., 2001, vol. 4, pp. 97-106. https://doi.org/10.2118/71203-PA

Alvarado V., Manrique E. Enhanced oil recovery: An update review. Energies, 2010, vol. 3, pp. 1529-1575. https://doi.org/10.3390/en3091529

Thomas S. Enhanced oil recovery – An overview. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Rev. IFP, 2008, vol. 63, pp. 9-19. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2007060

Lake L.W. Enhanced oil recovery. Prentice Hall, 1989. 550 p.

Afanasyev A.A., Andreeva A.I., Chernova A.A. Influence of oil field production life on optimal CO2 flooding strategies: Insight from the microscopic displacement efficiency. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 2021, vol. 205, 108803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108803

Kostyuchenko S.V. Direct calculation of the current sweep efficiency at geologic-hydrodynamic modeling. Neftyanoye khozyaystvo – Oil industry, 2006, no. 10, pp. 58-61.

Zheltov Yu.P. Razrabotka neftyanykh mestorozhdeniy [Development of oil fields]. Moscow, Nedra, 1986. 332 p.

Siraev R.R. Fluid transport in Forchheimer porous medium with spatially varying porosity and permeability. Vychisl. mekh. splosh. sred – Computational Continuum Mechanics, 2019, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 281-292. https://doi.org/10.7242/1999-6691/2019.12.3.24

Redlich O., Kwong J.N.S. On the thermodynamics of solutions. V. An equation of state. Fugacities of gaseous solutions. Chem. Rev., 1949, vol. 44, pp. 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60137a013

Soave G. Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state. Chem. Eng. Sci., 1972, vol. 27, pp. 1197-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(72)80096-4

Lohrenz J., Bray B.G., Clark C.R. Calculating viscosities of reservoir fluids from their compositions. J. Pet. Technol., 1964, vol. 16, pp. 1171-1176. https://doi.org/10.2118/915-PA

Corey A.T. The Interrelation between gas and oil relative permeability. Producers Monthly, 1954, vol. 19, pp. 38-41.

Kenyon D. Third SPE comparative solution project: Gas cycling of retrograde condensate reservoirs. J. Pet. Technol., 1987, vol. 39, pp. 981-997. https://doi.org/10.2118/12278-PA

Afanasyev A. Hydrodynamic modelling of petroleum reservoirs using simulator MUFITS. Energy Procedia, 2015, vol. 76, pp. 427-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.861

Afanasyev A., Andreeva A., Chernova A. Numerical optimisation of CO2 flooding using a hierarchy of reservoir models. Adv. Geosci., 2021, vol. 56, pp. 19-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-56-19-2021

Rodrigues H., Mackay E., Arnold D. Proc. of the SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference. Galveston, Texas, USA, April 10 11, 2019. SPE-193882-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/193882-MS

Salem S., Moawad T. Proc. of the SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and Exhibition. Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, May 19-22, 2013. SPE-168064-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/168064-MS

Chen B., Pawar R. Proc. of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Dallas, Texas, USA, September 24-26, 2018. SPE-191604-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/191604-ms

Published

2022-10-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Andreeva, A. I., & Afanasyev, A. A. (2022). Comparison of the optimal water-alternating-gas injection strategies using 1-D and 2-D reservoir simulations. Computational Continuum Mechanics, 15(3), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.7242/1999-6691/2022.15.3.19