Influence of hydrodynamic regimes on mixing of waters of confluent rivers

Authors

  • Tat’yana Petrovna Lyubimova Institute of Continuous Media Mechanics UB RAS; Perm State University
  • Anatoliy Pavlovich Lepikhin Mining Institute UB RAS; Perm State University
  • Yanina Nikolayevna Parshakova Institute of Continuous Media Mechanics UB RAS
  • Carlo Gualtieri University of Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy
  • Stuart Nicholas Lane Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Bernard Roux Laboratoire Mécanique, Modélisation et Procédés Propres, Marseille, France

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7242/1999-6691/2018.11.3.26

Keywords:

confluence of two rivers, secondary flows, three-dimensional numerical modeling, weakening of transverse mixing

Abstract

At present, a significant weakening of the intensity of transverse mixing at the confluence of large rivers, which is observed in a number of cases, is widely discussed. Since the observed features of the confluence of large watercourses are not only of research interest, but also of significant economic importance associated with the characteristics of water management at these water bodies, a large number of works are devoted to their study. To explain this interesting phenomenon important from the point of view of ecology, a wide range of hypotheses is proposed, up to the negation of turbulence in rivers. One of the possible mechanisms for explaining the “suppression” of transversal mixing can be the presence of transverse circulation, manifested as Prandtl’s secondary flows of second kind. The characteristic velocity of these circulation flows is very small and difficult to measure directly, but they can significantly complicate the transverse mixing of the flow. In the present work, this hypothesis is tested on the basis of computational experiments in a three-dimensional formulation, performed for the configuration modeling of the Kama river at its confluence with the Vishera river. Calculations have shown that, at sufficiently large flow rates the two waters practically do not mix in the horizontal direction throughout the depth over long distances from the confluence. The reason for the weakening of transversal mixing is the formation of a two-vortex flow in the cross section below the confluence place. The fluid motion in vortices is such that, near the free surface, the fluid moves from the banks to the middle of the river.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apollov B.A. Ucheniye o rekakh [The doctrine of the rivers]. M.: Moscow State University, 1951. 522 p.

https://www.tripadvisor.ru/ShowUserReviews-g303235-d5554183-r229755948 (accessed 12 Oktober 2018).

Makkaveyev V.M. O rasprostranenii rastvorov v turbulentnom potoke i o khimicheskom metode izmereniya raskhoda [On the distribution of solutions in the turbulent flow and the chemical method of measuring the flow. GGI – Notes of the State Hydrological Institute, 1933, vol. X, pp. 229-246.

Schmidt W. Der massenaustausch in freier luft und verwandte erscheinungen [The mass exchange in the open air and related phenomena]. Hamburg, 127 c.

Karaushev A.V., Meyerovich L.N., Serkov N.K. Modelirovaniye zon rasprostraneniya nekonservativnykh zagryaznyayushchikh veshchestv v vodoyemakh [Modeling of distribution zones of non-conservative pollutants in water bodies]. Trudy GGI – Works of the State Hydrological Institute, 1982, iss. 283, pp. 116-125.

Taylor G. Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Roy. Soc., 1953, vol. 219, no. 1137, pp. 186‑203. DOI

Prandtl’ L. Gidroeromekhanika [Hydromechanics]. Izhevsk: Regulyarnaya i khaoticheskaya dinamika, 2000. 576 p.

Fisher H.В. Dispersion predictions in natural streams. Sanitary Eng. Div. ABSE, 1968, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 927-944.

Bansal M.K. Dispersion in natural streams. Hydr. Div., 1971, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 1867-1886.

Best J.L. Sediment transport and bed morphology at river channel confluences. Sedimentology, 1988, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 481- DOI

Leite Ribeiro M., Blanckaert K., Roy A.G., Schleiss A.J. Flow and sediment dynamics in channel confluences. Geophys. Res., 2012, vol. 117, no. F1, F01035. DOI

Constantinescu G., Miyawaki Sh., Rhoads B., Sukhodolov A., Kirkil G. Structure of turbulent flow at a river confluence with momentum and velocity ratios close to 1: Insight provided by an eddy-resolving numerical simulation. Water Resour. Res., 2011, vol. 47, no. 5, W05507. DOI

Lepikhin A.P., Lyubimova T.P., Parshakova Ya.N., Tiunov A.A. Numerical modeling of dilution and transport of highly mineralized brines in turbulent flows. meh. splos. sred – Computational Continuum Mechanics, 2010, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 68-79. DOI

Lyubimova T., Lepikhin A., Konovalov V., Parshakova Ya., Tiunov A. Formation of the density currents in the zone of confluence of two rivers. Hydrol., 2014, vol. 508, pp. 328-342. DOI

Lyubimova T.P., Lepikhin A.P., Parshakova Ya.N., Tsiberkin K.B. Numerical modeling of liquid-waste infiltration from storage facilities into surrounding groundwater and surface-water bodies. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys., 2016, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 58-66. DOI

Launder B.E., Spalding D.B. Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence. London, England: Academic Press, 1972. 169 p.

Published

2018-10-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Lyubimova, T. P., Lepikhin, A. P., Parshakova, Y. N., Gualtieri, C. ., Lane, S. N., & Roux, B. . (2018). Influence of hydrodynamic regimes on mixing of waters of confluent rivers. Computational Continuum Mechanics, 11(3), 354-361. https://doi.org/10.7242/1999-6691/2018.11.3.26