Calculation of aircraft impact load on the NPP nuclear island buildings

Authors

  • Yuriy Vladislavovich Novozhilov CADFEM CIS JSC
  • Dmitriy Sergeyevich Mikhaluk CADFEM CIS JSC
  • Lyudmila Yur’yevna Feoktistova ATOMPROECT JSC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7242/1999-6691/2018.11.3.22

Keywords:

nuclear power plants, safety, extreme loads, technological disaster, aircraft impact, concrete, fracture, dynamics, stress-strain state, finite element analysis, explicit integration scheme, Eulerian

Abstract

The IAEA safety requirements require that the design of nuclear power plants (NPPs) considers both the potential technological disaster and acts of nature. One of the applicable mandatory IAEA SRS 87 requirements is assessing the risk of heavy commercial aircraft crashing into or attacking nuclear power plant reinforced concrete structures. The standards determine the distribution of loads on the building structures as a result of the impact of such aircrafts as the Boeing 720 and the Boeing 707-320. In the simplest case, when an aircraft strikes a plane low-deformable target normally, the structural load can be considered directly as a distributed force mapped on the target face. However, when an aircraft strikes at a tangent to the surface of the structure or when the load is imposed on the surface of complex-geometry structures or the possibility of successive target penetration needs to be considered, this loading method is useless. This paper suggests a universal methodology for modeling the loads imposed on building structures as a result of an aircraft impact. Aircraft modeling is based on the Eulerian formulation of the finite element method (FEM). The obtained relations can be used to identify the geometry, structural and mass parameters of the finite element aircraft model for a given load and determined impact imprint. The comparison of specified pressure loads and impact loads on the reinforced concrete structure shows a close match of the results. The obtained mathematical model of a heavy commercial aircraft can be used for numerical simulation of an aircraft crash into NPP buildings and structures in accordance with the new IAEA requirements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

External events excluding earthquakes in the design of nuclear power plants. Safety guide No. NS-G-1.5. Viena: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2003. 115 p.

Safety aspects of nuclear power plants in human induced external events: General considerations. Safety Reports Series No. 86. IAEA, 2017. 88 p.

Riera J.D. On the stress analysis of structures subjected to aircraft impact forces. Nucl. Eng. Des., 1968, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 415-426. DOI

Birbraer A.N., Roleder A.J. Extreme actions on structures. Saint-Petersburg: Polytechnic University Publishing House, 2009. 594 p.

Kultsep A., Souli M., Volkodav I. Proc. of the 22nd Conf. on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology. SMiRT 22, San Francisco, California, USA, August 18-23, 2013. Vol.1. P. 1976-1984.

Riera J.D. Advances in the analysis of NPP and other critical structures subjected to aircraft impact, available at: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/39529261/advances-in-the-analysis-of-npp-and-other-critical-structures- (accessed 24 September 2018).

Riera J.D., Zorn N.F., Schueller G.I. An approach to evaluate the design load time history for normal engine impact taking into account the crash-velocity distribution. Nucl. Eng. Des., 1982, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 311-316. DOI

Siefert A., Henkel F.O. Nonlinear analysis of commercial aircraft impact on a reactor building - Comparison between integral and decoupled crash simulation. Nucl. Eng. Des., 2014, vol. 269, pp. 130-135. DOI

LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2017. Vol. I. 2882 p.

Improving robustness assessment methodologies for structures impacted by missiles (IRIS_2012). Final Report.
2014. 105 p.

Ilyushkin M.V. Modelirovaniye protsessov obrabotki metallov davleniyem v programme LS-DYNA [Simulation of pressure metals processing process in the program LS-DYNA]. Ul’yanovsk, 2017. 125 p.

Chen H. Structured ALE Workshop, available at: http://ftp.lstc.com/anonymous/outgoing/hao/ sale/tutorials/SALE_2016_class.pdf (accessed 24 September 2018).

von Riesemann W.A. [et al.] Proc. of the 10th Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology. SMiRT 10, Anaheim, CA, USA, August 22-27, 1989, pp. 285–292. Muto K. [et al.] Proc. of the 10th Conf. on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology. SMiRT 10, Anaheim, CA, USA, August 22-27, 1989, pp. 293–299.

Sugano T. [et al.] Full-scale aircraft impact test for evaluation of impact force. Nucl. Eng. Des., 1993, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 373-385. DOI

LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2017. Vol. II: Material Models. 1577 p.

Shkolnikov M.B. Proc. of the 7th Int. LS-DYNA Users Conf. Detroit, MI, USA, May 19-21, 2002.
P. 7-1–7-14.

Hallquist J.O. LS-DYNA Theory Manual. Livermore: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2016.

Commercial aircraft of the world. Flight Int., 1964, Vol. 86, no. 2907, pp. 902-941.

Moutoussamy L., Herve G., Barbier F. Qualification of *Constrained Lagrange In Solid command for steel/concrete interface modeling, available at: https://www.dynamore.de/de/download/papers/konferenz11/papers/session12-paper3.pdf (accessed 24 September 2018).

Murray Y.D. Proc. of the 8th International LS-DYNA Users Conf. Detroit, MI, USA, May 2-4, 2004. P. 6-25–6-36.

Murray Y.D. Users Manual for LS-DYNA Concrete Material Model 159. Report No. FHWA-HRT-05-062, May 2007. 89 p.

Kachanov L.M. Osnovy mekhaniki razrusheniya [Fundamentals of fracture mechanics]. M.: Nauka, 1974. 312 p.

Seismic Design Criteria for Structures, Systems, and Components in Nuclear Facilities. ASCE 43-05. 2005. 96 p.

Published

2018-10-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Novozhilov, Y. V., Mikhaluk, D. S., & Feoktistova, L. Y. (2018). Calculation of aircraft impact load on the NPP nuclear island buildings. Computational Continuum Mechanics, 11(3), 288-301. https://doi.org/10.7242/1999-6691/2018.11.3.22