Дрожжи в микробных консорциумах, осуществляющих биодеградацию органических экополлютантов
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7242/2658-705X/2026.3.5Ключевые слова:
кворумный ответ, биокатализаторы, искусственные консорциумы, углеводороды нефти, микотоксины, фунгициды, красители, синтетические полимерыАннотация
Среди микробных деструкторов органических экозагрязнителей особое место занимают дрожжи, способные формировать консорциумы с различными микроорганизмами. В работе проведен анализ наиболее часто встречающихся партнеров дрожжевых клеток в природных микробных консорциумах, а также указаны экополлютанты, деградация которых в загрязненных средах под действием полимикробных биосистем наиболее хорошо изучена. К числу таких экополлютантов относятся углеводороды нефти, микотоксины, фунгициды, красители, синтетические полимеры. В их биодеградации отмечена значимая роль разнообразных дрожжевых ферментных систем. Природный химический состав клеточных стенок дрожжей, а также их способность синтезировать и внутриклеточно накапливать определенные белки и пептиды обеспечивают дрожжи мощным сорбционным потенциалом по отношению к различным тяжелым металлам, отличающим их от других микроорганизмов. Максимальные степень и скорости биодеградации экозагрязнителей, которые присутствуют в водных средах, достигаются под действием консорциумов, содержащих высокие концентрации клеток дрожжей. Особое внимание уделено формированию кворумного ответа у дрожжей и его роли в регуляции свойств, проявляемых клетками в консорциумах. Отмечена возможность регуляции интенсивности развития биопленок и проявления кворума у клеток в консорциумах через регуляцию концентраций специфичных кворумных молекул. Обсуждаются возможности и перспективы конструирования искусственных консорциумов с участием дрожжей. Представленная информация дает понимание роли консорциумов дрожжей в высоко востребованных в современном мире процессах биодеградации органических экополлютантов.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Krishna Raj C., Siranjeevi R., Susmitha, R., Sameera Shabnum S., Saravanan A., Vickram A.S., Chopra H. Bioremediation in action: Recent progress, challenges, and future directions for environmental restoration // Biodegradation. 2026. – Vol. 37. – Article 9. DOI: 10.1007/s10532-025-10232-3.
2. Omar A.N., Chirnside A.E.M., Kniel K.E. Exploring novel fungal bioremediation treatments to inhibit pollutants and microbial hazards associated with untreated biological soil amendments of animal origin // Microorganisms. – 2025. – Vol. 13. – Article 2847. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13122847.
3. Efremenko E. Editorial for special issue “Biotechnology for environmental remediation” // Microorganisms. – 2026. – Vol.14. – Article 283. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms14020283.
4. Qattan S.Y.A. Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants // Environmental Sciences Europe. – 2025. – Vol. 37. – Article 85. DOI: 10.1186/s12302-025-01103-y.
5. Senko O., Stepanov N., Maslova O., Gladchenko M., Gaydamaka S., Aslanli A., Efremenko E. Artificially obtained humic-like substances from chicken manure and symbionts in in vitro and in situ improvement of oil degradation in soil // Arabian Journal of Geosciences. – 2024. – Vol. 17. – Article 300. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-024-12105-0.
6. Salini A., Zuliani L., Gonnelli P.M., Orlando M., Odoardo A., Ragno D., Aulitto M., Zaccone C., Fusco S. Plastic-degrading microbial consortia from a wastewater treatment plant // International Journal of Molecular Sciences. – 2024. – Vol. 25. – Article 12747. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252312747.
7. Moreno-Gámez S., Hochberg M.E., van Doorn G.S. Quorum sensing as a mechanism to harness the wisdom of the crowds // Nature Communications. – 2023. – Vol. 14. – Article 3415. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37950-7.
8. Efremenko E., Senko O., Stepanov N., Aslanli A., Maslova O., Lyagin I. Quorum sensing as a trigger that improves characteristics of microbial biocatalysts // Microorganisms. – 2023. – Vol. 11. – Article 1395. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11061395.
9. Tian X., Ding H., Ke W., Wang L. Quorum sensing in fungal species // Annual Review of Microbiology. – 2021. – Vol. 75. – P. 449–469. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-micro-060321-045510.
10. Sun J., Sun H., Lv W., Zhang Q., Wan P., Jiang L., Zhong Y. Quorum sensing mediates yeast cell morphology to improve settleability: Implication for wastewater treatment // Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. – 2021. – Vol. 9. – Article 105817. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105817.
11. Pawlikowska-Warych M., Tokarz-Deptuła B., Czupryńska P., Deptuła W. Biofilm and quorum sensing in archaea // Acta Biologica. –2019. – Vol. 26. – P.35–44. DOI: 10.18276/AB.2019.26-04.
12. Zhou Y., Tang L., Chen D., Li Y., Wu S., Qiao J. Analysis and engineering of quorum sensing-based communications between bacteria and fungi // mBio. – 2026. – Vol. 17. – Article e0383825. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03838-25.
13. Maslova O., Senko O., Gladchenko M.A., Gaydamaka S.N., Efremenko E. Prospects for combined applications of nanostructured catalysts and biocatalysts for elimination of hydrocarbon pollutants // Applied Sciences. – 2023. – Vol. 13. – Article 5815. DOI: 10.3390/app13095815.
14. Al-Mur B.A., Pugazhendi A., Jamal M.T. Application of integrated extremophilic (halo-alkalothermophilic) bacterial consortium in the degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons and treatment of petroleum refinery wastewater under extreme condition // Journal of Hazardous Materials. – 2021. – Vol. 413. – Artile 125351. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125351.
15. Efremenko E., Senko O., Teplova K., Aslanli A. Biomass of microalgae and other phototrophic microorganisms: Current trends in regulation of its accumulation and application of immobilized forms // Applied Sciences. – 2025. – Vol. 15. – Article 12775. DOI: 10.3390/app152312775.
16. Wang J., Chen X., Sun H., Li X., Lu Q., Qin P., Yang Y., Lai D., Luo L., Peng X., Yang Y., Wu Z. Accelerated removal and mechanism of tetracycline from water using immobilized bacteria combined with microalgae // Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. – 2025. – Vol. 13. – Article 115424. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2025.115424.
17. Krivoruchko А.V., Kuyukina M.S, Ivshina I.B. Advanced Rhodococcus biocatalysts for environmental biotechnologies // Catalysts. − 2019. − Vol. 9. − Article 236. DOI: 1.3390/catal9030236.
18. Senko O., Maslova O., Aslanli A., Efremenko E. Impact of perfluorocarbons with gas transport function on growth of phototrophic microorganisms in a free and immobilized state and in consortia with bacteria // Applied Sciences. − 2023. − Vol. 13. − Article 1868. DOI: 10.3390/app13031868.
19. Efremenkо, E., Senko O., Maslova O., Lyagin I., Aslanli A., Stepanov N. Destruction of мycotoxins in poultry waste under anaerobic conditions within methanogenesis catalyzed by artificial microbial consortia // Toxins. − 2023. Vol. 15. − Article 205. DOI: 10.3390/toxins15030205.
20. Филимонов И.В., Янковская А.А., Кужелко С.В., Завьялов В.В., Завьялова Н.В., Голипад А.Н., Колесников Д.П., Ковтун В.А., Холстов В.И., Лягин И.В., Ефременко Е.Н. Исследования в сфере перспективного использования химико-биологических и медицинских биокаталитических технологий в интересах Вооруженных Сил // Вестник войск РХБ защиты. − 2018. − Т. 2. − № 2. − С. 18-50. DOI: 10.35825/2587-5728-2018-2-2-18-50.
21. Ramdass A.C., Rampersad S.N. Naturally-occurring microbial consortia for the potential bioremediation of hydrocarbon-polluted sites in Trinidad // Bioremediation Journal. – 2023. – Vol. 27. – P. 443-452. DOI: 10.1080/10889868.2022.2043235.
22. Padilla-Garfias F., Araiza-Villanueva M., Calahorra M., Sánchez N.S., Peña A. Advances in the degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by yeasts: A Review // Microorganisms. – 2024. – Vol. 12. Article 2484. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12122484.
23. Gururani P., Bhatnagar P., Kumar V., Vlaskin M.S., Grigorenko A.V. Algal сonsortiums: A novel and integrated approach for wastewater treatment // Water. – 2022. – Vol 14. – Article 3784. DOI: 10.3390/w14223784.
24. Walls L.E., Velasquez-Orta S.B., Romero-Frasca E., Leary P., Noguez I.Y., Ledesma M.T.O. Nonsterile heterotrophic cultivation of native wastewater yeast and microalgae for integrated municipal wastewater treatment and bioethanol production. // Biochemical Engineering Journal. – 2019. – Vol. 151. – Article 107319. DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2019.107319.
25. Yang Q., Angly F.E., Wang Z., Zhang H. Wastewater treatment systems harbor specific and diverse yeast communities // Biochemical Engineering Journal. – 2011. – Vol. 58. – P. 168–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2011.09.012.
26. Efremenko E., Stepanov N., Senko O. Maslova O, Volikov A., Zhirkova A., Perminova I. Strategies for variable regulation of methanogenesis efficiency and velocity // Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. – 2022. – Vol. 106. – P. 6833–6845. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-022-12148-x.
27. Wen H., Xiong K., Yang H., Zhang P., Wang X. Dynamic mechanism of the microbiota of highsalinity organic wastewater with salt-tolerant yeast and its application. // Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. – 2022. – Vol. 10. – Article 107377. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107377.
28. Malik K., Salama E.S., El-Dalatony M.M., Jalalah M., Harraz F.A., Al-Assiri M.S., Li X. Cofermentation of immobilized yeasts boosted bioethanol production from pretreated cotton stalk lignocellulosic biomass: Long-term investigation // Industrial Crops and Products. – 2021. – Vol. 159. – Article 113122. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113122.
29. Belda I, Benitez-Dominguez B, Izquierdo-Gea S, Vila JCC, Ruiz J. Ecology and evolutionary biology as frameworks to study wine fermentations // Microbial Biotechnology. – 2025. – Vol. 18. – Article e70078. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.70078.
30. Benito Á., Calderón F., Benito S. The influence of non-Saccharomyces species on wine fermentation quality parameters // Fermentation. 2019. – Vol. 5. – Article 54. DOI: 10.3390/fermentation5030054.
31. da Silva E.G., Borges A.S., Maione N.R., Castiglioni G.L., Suarez C.A., Montano I.D. Fermentation of hemicellulose liquor from Brewer’s spent grain using Scheffersomyces stipitis and Pachysolen tannophilus for production of 2G ethanol and xylitol // Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining – 2020. – Vol. 14. – P. 127–137. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.2072.
32. Ali S.S., Wu J., Xie R., Zhou F., Sun J., Huang M. Screening and characterizing of xylanolytic and xylose-fermenting yeasts isolated from the wood-feeding termite, Reticulitermes chinensis // PLoS ONE – 2017. – Vol. 12. – Article e0181141. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181141.
33. Ruchala J., Sibirny A.A. Pentose metabolism and conversion to biofuels and high-value chemicals in yeasts // FEMS Microbiology Reviews. – 2022. – Vol. 45. – Article fuaa069. DOI: /10.1093/femsre/fuaa069.
34. Stepanov N., Efremenko E. Immobilized cells of Pachysolen tannophilus yeast for ethanol production from crude glycerol // New biotechnology – 2017. – Vol. 34. – P. 54–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.05.002.
35. Chen L., Du J.-L., Zhan Y.-J., Li J.-A., Zuo R.-R., Tian S. Consolidated bioprocessing for cellulosic ethanol conversion by cellulase–xylanase cell-surfaced yeast consortium // Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology. – 2018. – Vol. 48. –– P. 653–661. DOI: 10.1080/10826068.2018.1487846;
36. da Silva Fernandes F., de Souza É.S, Carneiro L.M, Alves Silva J.P., de Souza J.V.B., da Silva Batista J. Current ethanol production requirements for the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae // International Journal of Microbiology. – 2022. – Vol. 2022. – Article 7878830. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7878830.
37. Kulshrestha A., Gupta P. Polymicrobial interaction in biofilm: mechanistic insights. // Pathogens and Disease. – 2022. – Vol. 80. – Article ftac010. DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftac010.
38. Ponde N.O., Lortal L., Ramage G., Naglik J.R., Richardson J.P. Candida albicans biofilms and polymicrobial interactions // Critical Reviews in Microbiology. – 2021. – Vol. 47. – P. 91–111. DOI: 10.1080/1040841X.2020.1843400.
39. Aeini K., Zoghi A., Khosravi-Darani K. Application of yeasts as pollutant adsorbents // Current Microbiology. – 2025. – Vol. 82. – Article 368. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-025-04343-6.
40. Mohiuddin O.P., Harvey A., Orta Ledesma M.T., Velasquez-Orta S. Bioremediation of waste by yeast strains // Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. – 2024. – Vol. 69. – P. 30–42. DOI: 10.1016/J.EJBT.2024.01.005.
41. Rahman Z., Singh V.P. Bioremediation of toxic heavy metals (THMs) contaminated sites: concepts, applications and challenges // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. – 2020. – Vol. 27. – P. 27563–27581. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08903-0.
42. Xie S. Biosorption of heavy metal ions from contaminated wastewater: an eco-friendly approach // Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews. – 2024. – Vol. 17. – Article 2357213. DOI: 10.1080/17518253.2024.2357213.
43. Aibeche C., Selami N., Zitouni-Haouar F.E.H., Oeunzar K., Addou A., Kaid-Harche M., Djabeur A. Bioremediation potential and lead removal capacity of heavy metal-tolerant yeasts isolated from Dayet Oum Ghellaz Lake water (northwest of Algeria) // International Microbiology. – 2020. – Vol. 25. – P. 61–73. DOI: 10.1007/s10123-021-00191-z.
44. Gupta N., Arunachalam S. From consortium design to bioaugmented filters: scalable yeast-based strategies for lead remediation in water systems // Front Microbiology. – 2025. – Vol. 16. – Article 1647398. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1647398.
45. De Rossi A., Rigueto C.V.T., Dettmer A., Colla L.M., Piccin J.S. Synthesis, characterization, and application of Saccharomyces cerevisiae/alginate composites beads for adsorption of heavy metals // Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. – 2020. – Vol. 8. – Article 104009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104009.
46. Chen C., Hu J., Wang J. Uranium biosorption by immobilized active yeast cells entrapped in calciumalginate-PVA-GO-crosslinked gel beads // Radiochimica Acta. – 2020. – Vol. 108. – P. 273–286. DOI: 10.1515/RACT-2019-3150.
47. Lyagin I., Aslanli A., Domnin M., Stepanov N., Senko O., Maslova O., Efremenko E. Metal nanomaterials and hydrolytic enzyme-based formulations for improved antifungal activity // International Journal of Molecular Sciences. – 2023. – Vol. 24. – Article 11359. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411359.
48. Papp L.A., Horváth E., Peles F., Pócsi I., Miklós I. Insight into yeast–mycotoxin relations // Agriculture. – 2021. – Vol. 11. – Article 1291. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11121291.
49. Lyagin I., Efremenko E. Enzymes for detoxification of various mycotoxins: Origins and mechanisms of catalytic action // Molecules. – 2019. – Vol. 24.– Article 2362. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24132362.
50. Alasmar R., Ul-Hassan Z., Zeidan R., Al-Thani R., Al-Shamary N., Alnaimi H., Migheli Q., Jaoua S. Isolation of a novel Kluyveromyces marxianus strain QKM-4 and evidence of its volatilome production and binding potentialities in the biocontrol of toxigenic fungi and their mycotoxins // ACS Omega. – 2020. – Vol. 5. – P. 17637–17645. DOI: /10.1021/acsomega.0c02124.
51. Papp L.A., Adácsi C., Acs-Szabo L., Batta G., Csoma H., Pusztahelyi T., Pócsi I., Miklós I. Cocultivation of Schizosaccharomyces japonicus and Fusarium graminearum reveals the biocontrol effect of yeast and its potential genes for detoxification // Agriculture. – 2026. – V. 16 – Article 494. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture16050494.
52. Ruchała J., Vasylyshyn R., Wnuk, M. Yeast‐based biotechnology for civilian security // Environmental Microbiology Reports. – 2026. – Vol. 18. – Article e70280. DOI:10.1111/1758-2229.70280.
53. Alimi J.O., Bamishaye E.I., Alimi J.P. Yeasts as biological detoxifiers of mycotoxins in agricultural produce. A Review // Food and Environment Safety Journal. – 2025. – Vol. 24. – P. 21-32. DOI: 10.4316/fens.2025.003.
54. Papp L.A., Acs-Szabo L., Kovacs S., Adacsi C., Batta G., Pusztahelyi T., Pocsi I., Miklos I. Transcriptome changes of fission yeast cells exposed to fumonisin B1 or co-cultured with Fusarium verticillioides // Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. – 2025. – Vol. 109. – Article 211. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-025-13601-3.
55. Xiao J., Tan J., Guo R., Dai J., Xiu Z., Sun Y., Liu H., Li Y., Tong Y., Quan C. Deoxynivalenol detoxification by a novel strain of Pichia kudriavzevii via enzymatic degradation and cell wall adsorption // Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. – 2024. – Vol. 196. – P. 3102–3114. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-023-04712-6.
56. Acs-Szabo L., Pfliegler W.P., Kovacs S., Adacsi C., Racz H.V., Horvath E., Papp L.A., Murvai K.P., Kiraly S., Miklos I., Peter G., Pusztahelyi T., Pocsi I. Striking mycotoxin tolerance and zearalenone elimination capacity of the decaying wood associated yeast Sugiyamaella novakii (Trichomonascaceae) // BMC Microbiology. – 2025. – Vol. 25. – Article 422. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-025-04145-7.
57. Azizi T., Daneshyar M., Allymehr M., Tukmechi A., Behroozyar H.K., Jalali A.S. Effect of a probiotic (Lactobacillus sp.), yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and mycotoxin detoxifier alone or in combination on performance, immune response and serum biochemical parameters in broilers fed deoxynivalenolcontaminated diets // Animal Production Science. – 2021. – Vol. 61. – P. 1553–1563. DOI: 10.1071/AN19728.
58. Fu Y., Yang Q., Solairaj D., Godana E.A., Routledge M.N., Zhang H. Biodegradation of mycotoxin patulin by the yeast Meyerozyma guilliermondii // Biological Control. – 2021. – Vol. 160. – Article 104692. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104692.
59. Zhang M., Wen Y., Luo X., Wang X., Li J., Liu A., He L., Chen S., Ao X., Yang Y., Zou L., Liu S. Characterization, mechanism of cypermethrin biosorption by Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains YS81 and HP and removal of cypermethrin from apple and cucumber juices by inactive cells // Journal of hazardous materials. – 2021. – Vol. 407. – Article 124350. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124350.
60. Becerra K., Ghosh S., Godoy L. Pesticide and yeast interaction in alcoholic fermentation: A MiniReview // Fermentation. – 2023. – Vol. 9. – Article 266. DOI: 10.3390/fermentation9030266.
61. Jacqui T., Deroite A., Raynal C., Julien-Ortiz A., Camarasa C. Detoxification capabilities of copper and pesticides by winemaking yeasts. // OENO One. – 2025. – Vol. 59. – Article 9438. DOI: 10.20870/oeno-one.2025.59.4.9438.
62. Stoyanova K., Gerginova M., Peneva N., Dincheva I., Alexieva Z. Biodegradation and utilization of the pesticides glyphosate and carbofuran by two yeast strains // Processes. – 2023. – Vol. 11. – Article 3343. DOI: 10.3390/pr11123343.
63. Danouche M., El Arroussi H., Bahafid W., El Ghachtouli N. An overview of the biosorption mechanism for the bioremediation of synthetic dyes using yeast cells // Environmental Technology Reviews. – 2021. – Vol. 10. – P. 58–76. DOI: 10.1080/21622515.2020.1869839.
64. Azeez R.A., Al-Zuhairi F.K.I. Biosorption of dye by immobilized yeast cells on the surface of magnetic nanoparticles // Alexandria Engineering Journal. – 2022. –Vol. 61. – P. 5213–5222. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.044.
65. Al-Tohamy R., Kenawy E.R., Sun J., Ali, S.S. Performance of a newly isolated salt-tolerant yeast strain Sterigmatomyces halophilus SSA-1575 for azo dye decolorization and detoxification. // Frontiers in Microbiology. – 2020. – Vol. 11. – Article 1163. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01163.
66. Ruscasso F., Bezus B., Garmendia G., Vero S., Curutchet G., Cavello I., Cavalitto S. Debaryomyces hansenii F39A as biosorbent for textile dye removal // Revista Argentina de Microbiología. – 2021. – Vol. 53. – P. 257–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.ram.2020.10.004.
67. Wang X., Wang Y., Ning S., Shi S., Tan L. Improving azo dye decolorization performance and halotolerance of Pichia occidentalis A2 by static magnetic field and possible mechanisms through comparative transcriptome analysis // Frontiers in microbiology. – 2020. – Vol. 11. – Article 712. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00712.
68. Kurade M.B., Waghmode T.R., Xiong J.Q., Govindwar S.P., Jeon B.H. Decolorization of textile industry effluent using immobilized consortium cells in upflow fixed bed reactor. // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2019. – Vol. 213. – P. 884–891. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.218.
69. Ali S.S., Al-Tohamy R., Koutra E., El-Naggar A.H., Kornaros M., Sun J. Valorizing lignin-like dyes and textile dyeing wastewater by a newly constructed lipid-producing and lignin modifying oleaginous yeast consortium valued for biodiesel and bioremediation // Journal of Hazardous Materials. – 2021. – Vol. 403. – Article 123575. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123575.
70. Al-Tohamy R., Ali S.S., Xie R., Schagerl M., Khalil M.A., Sun J. Decolorization of reactive azo dye using novel halotolerant yeast consortium HYC and proposed degradation pathway // Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. – 2023. – Vol. 263. – Article 115258. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115258.
71. Eltarahony M., El-Fakharany E., Abu-Serie M., ElKady M., Ibrahim A. Statistical modeling of methylene blue degradation by yeast-bacteria consortium; optimization via agro-industrial waste, immobilization and application in real effluents // Microbial Cell Factories. – 2021. – Vol. 20. – Article 234. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-021-01730-z.
72. Kovács R., Majoros L. Fungal quorum-sensing molecules: A Review of their antifungal effect against Candida biofilms // Journal of Fungi. – 2020. – Vol. – 6. – Article 99. DOI: 10.3390/jof6030099.
73. Kovács R., Jakab Á. The effects of tyrosol on yeasts: an overview of current knowledge // Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. – 2025. – Vol. 109. – Article 201. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-025-13595-y.
74. Huang X.F., Reardon K.F. Quorum-sensing molecules increase ethanol yield from Saccharomyces cerevisiae // FEMS Yeast Research. – 2021. – Vol. 21. – Article foab056. DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/foab056.
75. Zhang D., Wang F., Yu Y., Ding S., Chen T., Sun W., Liang C., Yu B., Ying H., Liu D., Chen Y. Effect of quorum-sensing molecule 2-phenylethanol and ARO genes on Saccharomyces cerevisiae biofilm // Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. – 2021. – Vol. 105. – P. 3635–3648. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11280-4.
76. Li L., Pan Y., Zhang S., Yang T., Li Z., Wang B., Sun H., Zhang M., Li X. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae // Frontiers in Microbiology. – 2023. – Vol. 14. – Article 1250151. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250151.
77. Rodrigues C.F., Černáková L. Farnesol and tyrosol: secondary metabolites with a crucial quorumsensing role in Candida biofilm development // Genes. – 2020. – Vol. 11. – Article 444. DOI: 10.3390/genes11040444.
78. Dižová S., Bujdáková H. Properties and role of the quorum sensing molecule farnesol in relation to the yeast Candida albicans // Pharmazie. – 2017. – Vol. 72.– P.307-312. DOI: 10.1691/ph.2017.6174.
79. Nath B.J., Das K.K., Talukdar R., Sarma H.K. Tyrosols retrieved from traditionally brewed yeasts assist in tolerance against heavy metals and promote the growth of cells // FEMS Microbiology Letters. – 2021. – Vol. 368. – Article fnab152. DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnab152.
80. Zhang Q., Xiang J., Lv W., Liu Y., Sun J., Wan P., Jiang L. Quorum sensing molecules in yeast wastewater treatment and their regulation of yeast cell morphology // Journal of Water Process Engineering – 2022. – Vol. 49. – Article 103191. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103191.
81. Tang J., Liu Y., Lai F., Zhou Y., Zhang H., Ni B.J., Lv W. Zinc ions suppress filamentation of Candida tropicalis and enhance stability of yeast-based oil-rich wastewater treatment // Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. – 2026. – Vol. 14. – Article 121504. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2026.121504.
82. Sooklim C., Samakkarn W., Thongmee A., Duangphakdee O., Soontorngun N. Enhanced aroma and flavour profile of fermented Tetragonula pagdeni Schwarz honey by a novel yeast T. delbrueckii GT-ROSE1 with superior fermentability // Food Bioscience. – 2022. – Vol. 50. – Article 102001. DOI: /10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102001.
83. Nath B.J., Mishra A.K., Sarma H.K. Assessment of quorum sensing effects of tyrosol on fermentative performance by chief ethnic fermentative yeasts from northeast India // Journal of Applied Microbiology. – 2021. – Vol. 131. – P. 728–742. DOI: 10.1111/jam.14908.
84. Tian J., Lin Y., Su X., Tan H., Gan C., Ragauskas A.J. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae quorum sensing signal molecules on ethanol production in bioethanol fermentation process // Microbiological Research. – 2023. – Vol. 271. – Article 127367. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2023.127367.
85. Huang X.F., Reardon K.F. Strategies to achieve high productivity, high conversion, and high yield in yeast fermentation of algal biomass hydrolysate // Engineering in Life Sciences. – 2022. – Vol. 22. – P.119–131. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.202100095.
86. Ma R., Huang Z., Jiang Y., Zhao A., Yu G., Lin C., Zhu L., Zhang X., Li X., Wang, C. Regulation of ethanol production from anaerobic fermentation of food waste using aromatic alcohol-based quorumsensing molecules // Journal of Environmental Management. – 2025. – Vol. 376. – Article 124382. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124382.
87. Rosiana S., Zhang L., Kim G.H., Revtovich A.V., Uthayakumar D., Sukumaran A., Gedde-McAlister J., Kirienko N.V., Shapiro R.S. Comprehensive genetic analysis of adhesin proteins and their role in virulence of Candida albicans // Genetics. – 2021. – Vol. 217. – Article iyab003. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab003.
88. Jung P., Mischo C.E., Gunaratnam G., Spengler C., Becker S.L., Hube B., Jacobs K., Bischoff M. Candida albicans adhesion to central venous catheters: Impact of blood plasma-driven germ tube formation and pathogen-derived adhesins. // Virulence. – 2020. – Vol. – 11. – P. 1453–1465. DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1836902.
89. Gaálová-Radochová B., Kendra S., Jordao L., Kursawe L., Kikhney J., Moter A., Bujdáková H. Effect of quorum sensing molecule farnesol on mixed biofilms of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus. // Antibiotics. – 2023. – Vol. 12. – Article 441. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12030441.
90. Efremenko E., Stepanov N., Senko O., Maslova O., Lyagin I., Domnin M., Aslanli A. “Stop, little pot” as the motto of suppressive management of various microbial consortia. // Microorganisms. – 2024. – Vol. 12. – Article 1650. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12081650.
91. del Rosario Agustín M., Tarifa M.C., Vela-Gurovic M.S., Brugnoni L.I. Application of natamycin and farnesol as bioprotection agents to inhibit biofilm formation of yeasts and foodborne bacterial pathogens in apple juice processing lines // Food Microbiology. – 2023. – Vol. 109. – Article 104123. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2022.104123.
92. Touil H.F.Z., Boucheri, K., Boucherit-Otmani Z., Kohder G., Madkour M., Soliman S.S.M. Optimum inhibition of amphotericin-B-resistant Candida albicans strain in single- and mixed-species biofilms by Candida and Non-Candida terpenoids // Biomolecules. – 2020. – Vol. 10. – Article 342. DOI: 10.3390/biom10020342.
93. Aslanli A., Domnin M., Stepanov N., Efremenko E. “Universal” antimicrobial combination of bacitracin and His6-OPH with lactonase activity, acting against various bacterial and yeast cells // International Journal of Molecular Sciences. – 2022. – Vol. 23. – Article 9400. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169400.
94. Efremenko E., Aslanli A., Domnin M., Stepanov N., Senko O. Enzymes with lactonase activity against fungal quorum molecules as effective antifungals. // Biomolecules. – 2024. – Vol. 14. – Article 383. DOI: 10.3390/biom14030383.
95. Aslanli A., Domnin M., Stepanov N., Senko O., Efremenko E. Action enhancement of antimicrobial peptides by their combination with enzymes hydrolyzing fungal quorum molecules. // International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. – 2024. – Vol. 280. – Article 136066. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136066.
96. Efremenko E., Stepanov N., Senko O., Aslanli A., Maslova O., Lyagin I. Using fungi in artificial microbial consortia to solve bioremediation problems // Microorganisms. – 2024. – V. 12 – Article 470. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12030470.
97. Mittermeier F., Bäumler M., Arulrajah, P., García Lima J.J., Hauke S., Stock A., Weuster-Botz D. Artificial microbial consortia for bioproduction processes // Engineering in Life Sciences. – 2022. – Vol. 23. – Article e2100152. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.202100152.
98. Jiang Y., Wu R., Zhang W., Xin F., Jiang, M. Construction of stable microbial consortia for effective biochemical synthesis // Trends in Biotechnology. – 2023. – Vol. 41. – P.1430–1441. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.05.008.
99. Efremenko E., Stepanov N., Maslova O., Senko O., Aslanli A., Lyagin I. “Unity and struggle of opposites” as a basis for the functioning of synthetic bacterial immobilized consortium that continuously degrades organophosphorus pesticides. // Microorganisms. – 2022. – Vol. 10 – Article 1394. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10071394.
100. Darvishi F., Rafatiyan S., Abbaspour Motlagh Moghaddam M. H., Atkinson E., Ledesma-Amaro R. Applications of synthetic yeast consortia for the production of native and non-native chemicals // Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. – 2024. – Vol. 44. – P. 15–30. DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2022.2118569.
101. Stepanov N., Senko O., Aslanli A., Maslova O., Efremenko E. Enhanced biogas production from glucose and glycerol by artificial consortia of anaerobic sludge with immobilized yeast // Fermentation. – 2025. – Vol. 11. – Article 352. DOI: 10.3390/fermentation11060352.
102. Maslova O., Senko O., Stepanov N., Gladchenko M., Gaydamaka S., Akopyan A., Eseva E., Anisimov A., Efremenko E. Sulfur containing mixed wastes in anaerobic processing by new immobilized synthetic consortia // Bioresource Technology. – 2022. –Vol. 362. – Article 127794. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127794.
103. Maslova O., Senko O., Stepanov N., Gladchenko M., Gaydamaka S., Akopyan A., Polikarpova P., Lysenko S., Anisimov A., Efremenko E. Formation and use of anaerobic consortia for the biotransformation of sulfur-containing extracts from pre-oxidized crude oil and oil fractions // Bioresource Technology. – 2021. – Vol. 319. – Article 124248. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124248.
104. Elsamahy T., Sun J., Elsilk S.E., Ali S.S. Biodegradation of low-density polyethylene plastic waste by a constructed tri-culture yeast consortium from wood-feeding termite: Degradation mechanism and pathway // Journal of Hazardous Materials. – 2023. – Vol. 448. – Article 130944. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130944.
105. Kučić Grgić D., Miloloža M., Ocelić Bulatović V., Ukić Š., Slouf M., Gajdosova V. Screening the efficacy of a microbial consortium of bacteria and fungi isolated from different environmental samples for the degradation of LDPE/TPS films // Separations. – 2023. – Vol. 10. – Article 79. DOI: 10.3390/separations10020079.
106. Tunalı Boz D., Tansel Yalçın H., Çorbacı C.Ç., Bahriye Uçar, F. Screening and molecular characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons degrading yeasts // Turkish Journal of Biochemistry. – 2015. – Vol. 40. – P. 105–110. DOI: 10.5505/tjb.2015.16023.
107. Mandal S.K., Das N. Biodegradation of perylene and benzo[ghi]perylene (5-6 rings) using yeast consortium: Kinetic study, enzyme analysis and degradation pathway // Journal of Environmental Biology. – 2018. – Vol. 39. – P. 5–15. DOI: 10.22438/jeb/39/1/MRN-540.
108. Mandal S.K., Selvi A., Das N. A novel approach on degradation of benzo[a]pyrene by yeast consortium isolated from contaminated soil // Pharma Letter. – 2016. – Vol. 8. – P. 80–93.
109. Kamyabi A., Nouri H., Moghimi H. Characterization of pyrene degradation and metabolite identification by Basidioascus persicus and mineralization enhancement with bacterial-yeast co-culture // Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety – 2018. – Vol. 163. – P. 471–477. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.07.098.
110. Hesham A.E.-L., Khan S., Tao Y., Li D., Zhang Y., Yang M. Biodegradation of high molecular weight PAHs using isolated yeast mixtures: Application of metagenomic methods for community structure analyses // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. – 2012. – Vol. 19. – P. 3568–3578. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-0919-8.
111. Senko O, Maslova O, Stepanov N, Aslanli A, Lyagin I, Efremenko E. Role of humic substances in the (bio)degradation of synthetic polymers under environmental conditions // Microorganisms – 2024 – V. 12. – Article 2024. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12102024.
112. Ефременко Е.Н., Лягин И.В., Маслова О.В., Сенько О.В., Степанов Н.А., Асланлы А.Г. Каталитическое разложение микропластиков // Успехи химии. – 2023. – Т. 92. – № 2. – Статья RCR5069. DOI: 10.57634/RCR5069.
113. Chen H., Peng H., Ellis T., Ledesma-Amaro R. Programmable cell–cell adhesion in synthetic yeast communities for improved bioproduction // Nature Chemical Biology. – 2026. – DOI: 10.1038/s41589-025-02081-1.
114. Louhasakul Y., Cheirsilp B., Maneerat S., Prasertsan P. Potential use of flocculating oleaginous yeasts for bioconversion of industrial wastes into biodiesel feedstocks // Renewable Energy. – 2019. – Vol. 136. – P. 1311–1319. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.002.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 Вестник Пермского федерального исследовательского центра
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
