Smart-часы для медицины. Обзор
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7242/2658-705X/2026.1.1Ключевые слова:
носимая электроника, умные часы, фотоплетизмографияАннотация
Современные носимые устройства эволюционировали из простых шагомеров в сложные мультисенсорные системы, обеспечивающие непрерывный и неинвазивный мониторинг широкого спектра физиологических параметров. Этот переход превращает потребительские гаджеты в инструменты для превентивной медицины и биомедицинских исследований. Настоящий аналитический обзор сфокусирован на физических принципах, лежащих в основе регистрации физиологических параметров, и возможности их применения для контроля состояния здоровья. В центре внимания метод оптической фотоплетизмографии, позволяющий зарегистрировать модуляцию отраженного света пульсирующим кровотоком. Функционал smart-часов, дополненный в недавнее время измерением электрокардиограммы, имеет широкие возможности для медицинского использования этих гаджетов. Наиболее ожидаемые функции – оценка артериального давления и биохимических характеристик smart-часами. Во второй части обзора детально разобраны физиологические характеристики, которые могут быть получены из физических сигналов, регистрируемых smart-часами. В третьей части тезисно перечислены медицинские приложения, а в четвёртой – диагностическая ценность регистрируемых физиологических параметров, а также возможность использования получаемых данных в медицинской практике.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Dunn J., Runge R., Snyder M. Wearables and the medical revolution // Per Med. – 2018. – Vol. 15, № 5. – P. 429–448. DOI: 10.2217/pme-2018-0044.
2. Rising C. J. et al. Willingness to share data from wearable health and activity trackers: analysis of the 2019 health information national trends survey data //JMIR mHealth and uHealth. – 2021. – Vol. 9. – № 12. – С. e29190. DOI: 10.2196/29190
3. Dinh-Le C., Chuang R., Chokshi S., Mann D. Wearable health technology and electronic health record integration: scoping review and future directions // JMIR mHealth and uHealth. – 2019. – Vol. 7, № 9. – P. e12861. DOI: 10.2196/12861
4. Федорович А.А., Ососков В.С., Королев А.И., Васильев О.С., Драпкина О.М. Безманжеточные методы измерения артериального давления. Обзор современных технологий //Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. – 2024. – Т. 27. – № 12, стр. 156-165. DOI: 10.17116/profmed202427121156
5. American Heart Association. Life’s Simple 7. URL: https://www.heart.org/en/professional/workplacehealth/lifes-simple-7 (дата обращения: 18.12.2025).
6. Brew B., Faux S., Blanchard E. Effectiveness of a smartwatch app in detecting induced falls: observational study // JMIR formative research. – 2022. – Vol. 6, № 3. – P. e30121. DOI: 10.2196/30121
7. Lewy H. Wearable technologies-future challenges for implementation in healthcare services // Healthcare Technology Letters. – 2015. – Vol. 2, № 1. – P. 2-5. DOI: 10.1049/htl.2014.0104.
8. Han S. et al. Design of multi-wavelength optical sensor module for depth-dependent photoplethysmography // Sensors. – 2019. – Vol. 19, № 24. – P. 5441. DOI: 10.3390/s19245441.
9. Volkov M. V. et al. Video capillaroscopy clarifies mechanism of the photoplethysmographic waveform appearance // Scientific reports. – 2017. – Vol. 7, № 1. – P. 13298. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13552-4
10. Кирилин М.Ю., Куракина Д.А., Перекатова В.В. и др. Монте-Карло моделирование сигналов фотоплетизмографии и пульсоксиметрии для разработки носимых устройств. – 2025, Оптика и спектроскопия, 2025, том 133, вып.12, стр 1310-1320, DOI: 10.61011/OS.2025.12.62506.46-25.
11. Kantrowitz AB, Ben-David K, Morris M, Wittels HL, Wishon MJ, McDonald SM, Renaghan EJ, Feigenbaum LA, Wittels SH. Pulse rate variability is not the same as heart rate variability: findings from a large, diverse clinical population study. Front Physiol. 2025;16:1630032. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1630032.
12. Abdou A., Krishnan S. Horizons in single-lead ECG analysis from devices to data // Frontiers in Signal Processing. – 2022. – Vol. 2. – P. 866047. DOI: 10.3389/frsip.2022.866047
13. Samol A., Bischof K., Luani B. et al. Recording of bipolar multichannel ECGs by a smartwatch: Modern ECG diagnostic 100 years after Einthoven // Sensors. – 2019. – Vol. 19, № 13. – P. 2894. DOI: 10.3390/s19132894
14. Samol A., Bischof K., Luani B. et al. Single-lead ECG recordings including Einthoven and Wilson leads by a smartwatch: A new era of patient directed early ECG differential diagnosis of cardiac diseases? // Sensors. – 2019. – Vol. 19, № 20. – P. 4377. DOI: 10.3390/s19204377
15. Bailey T. S. Clinical implications of accuracy measurements of continuous glucose sensors // Diabetes Technol. Ther. – 2017. – Vol. 19 (Suppl. 2). – P. S51–S54. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2017.0050
16. Volkova E., Perchik A., Pavlov K. et al. Multispectral sensor fusion in SmartWatch for in situ continuous monitoring of human skin hydration and body sweat loss // Sci Rep. – 2023. – Vol. 13. – P. 13371. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40339-7.
17. Morales A., Barbosa M., Morás L. et al. Occupational Stress Monitoring Using Biomarkers and Smartwatches: A Systematic Review // Sensors. – 2022. – Vol. 22 – № 17. – P. 6633. DOI: 10.3390/s22176633.
18. Toru Erbay Ü., Parspur Ş.E., Arikan İ. et al. Are smart watches really smart? Comparison of blood oxygen saturation values measured by smart watch, pulse oximetry and arterial blood gases in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases // Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. – 2025. – Vol. 20. – P. 1457–1463. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S500643.
19. Electrophysiology T. F. E. S. C. N. A. S. P. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use // Circulation. – 1996. – Vol. 93. – № 5. – P. 1043-1065.
20. Fauzi M. A., Yang B., Blobel B. Comparative Analysis between Individual, Centralized, and Federated Learning for Smartwatch Based Stress Detection // Journal of Personalized Medicine. – 2022. – Vol. 12, № 10. – P. 1584. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101584.
21. Camm A. J. et al. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task force of the European society of cardiology and the north American society of pacing and electrophysiology // Circulation. – 1996. – Vol. 93, № 5. – P. 1043–1065.
22. Chalmers J. A. et al. Anxiety disorders are associated with reduced heart rate variability: a metaanalysis // Front Psychiatry. – 2014. – Vol. 5. – P. 80. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00080
23. Kapogianni N. A., Sideraki A., Anagnostopoulos C. N. Using Smartwatches in Stress Management, Mental Health, and Well-Being: A Systematic Review // Algorithms. – 2025. – Vol. 18, № 7. – P. 419. DOI: 10.3390/a18070419
24. Ding Y. et al. Integrated mental stress smartwatch based on sweat cortisol and HRV sensors // Biosensors and Bioelectronics. – 2024. – Vol. 265. – P. 116691. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2024.116691
25. Hellqvist H. et al. Estimation of aortic stiffness by finger photoplethysmography using enhanced pulse wave analysis and machine learning // Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. – 2024. – Vol. 11. – P. 1350726. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1350726
26. Chen W., Kobayashi T., Ichikawa S. et al. Continuous estimation of systolic blood pressure using the pulse arrival time and intermittent calibration // Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. – 2000. – Vol. 38. – P. 569–574. DOI: 10.1007/BF02345755.
27. Finnegan E., Davidson S., Harford M. et al. Pulse arrival time as a surrogate of blood pressure // Scientific Reports. – 2021. – Vol. 11. – P. 20694. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01358-4.
28. Luyster F. S., Strollo P. J., Zee P. C., Walsh J. K. Sleep: A health imperative // Sleep. – 2012. – Vol. 35, № 6. – P. 727–734.
29. Kuwabara M., Harada K., Hishiki Y., Kario K. Validation of two watch-type wearable blood pressure monitors according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060-2:2013 guidelines: Omron HEM-6410T-ZM and HEM-6410T-ZL // J. Clin. Hypertens. – 2019. – Vol. 21, №6. – P. 853–858. DOI: 10.1111/jch.13499.
30. Lee W. L., Danaee M., Abdullah A., Wong L. P. Is the blood pressure-enabled smartwatch ready to drive precision medicine? Supporting findings from a validation study // Cardiol Res. – 2023. – Vol. 14, № 6. – P. 437–445. DOI: 10.14740/cr1569.
31. Falter M., Scherrenberg M., Driesen K. et al. Smartwatch-Based Blood Pressure Measurement Demonstrates Insufficient Accuracy // Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. – 2022. – Vol. 9. – P. 958212. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.958212.
32. Lehmann V. et al. Noninvasive hypoglycemia detection in people with diabetes using smartwatch data //Diabetes Care. – 2023. – Vol. 46. – № 5. – С. 993-997.
33. Nakazawa T. et al. Non-invasive blood glucose estimation method based on the phase delay between oxy-and deoxyhemoglobin using visible and near-infrared spectroscopy // Journal of Biomedical Optics. – 2024. – Vol. 29. – № 3. – С. 037001-037001.
34. Lu Z. et al. Biomolecule sensors based on organic electrochemical transistors //npj Flexible Electronics. – 2025. – Vol. 9. – № 1. – С. 9.
35. Fuller D., Colwell E., Low J. et al. Reliability and validity of commercially available wearable devices for measuring steps, energy expenditure, and heart rate: systematic review // JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. – 2020. – Vol. 8, № 9. – P. e18694. DOI: 10.2196/18694.
36. Köhler C., Bartschke A., Fürstenau D. et al. The value of smartwatches in the health care sector for monitoring, nudging, and predicting: viewpoint on 25 years of research // J Med Internet Res. – 2024. – Vol. 26. – P. e58936. DOI: 10.2196/58936.
37. Mauldin T. R. et al. SmartFall: A smartwatch-based fall detection system using deep learning //Sensors. – 2018. – Vol. 18. – № 10. – С. 3363.36
38. McAfee A. et al. AlcoWear: Detecting blood alcohol levels from wearables //2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation. – IEEE, 2017. – P. 1-8.
39. Chen X., Xiao Y., Tang Y. et al. ApneaDetector: Detecting Sleep Apnea with Smartwatches // Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. – 2021. – Vol. 5, № 2. – Art. no. 66. DOI: 10.1145/3463514.
40. Chen Y., Wang W., Guo Y. et al. A single-center validation of the accuracy of a photoplethysmographybased smartwatch for screening obstructive sleep apnea // Nat Sci Sleep. – 2021. – Vol. 13. – P. 1533–1544. DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S323286.
41. Mehrabadi M. A., Azimi I., Sarhaddi F. et al. Sleep tracking of a commercially available smart ring and smartwatch against medical-grade actigraphy in everyday settings: Instrument validation study // JMIR MHealth UHealth. – 2020. – Vol. 8, № 11. – P. e20465. DOI: 10.2196/20465.
42. Fan J. et al. Smartwatch-detected arrhythmias in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): analysis of the SMART TAVR trial //Journal of Medical Internet Research. – 2024. – Т. 26. – С. e41843.
43. Chakrabarti S., Biswas N., Jones L. D., Ashili S. Role of smartwatches in diabetes patient care // Arch Diab Obes. – 2022. – Vol. 4, № 2. – P. 431–432. DOI: 10.32474/ADO.2022.04.000185.
44. Diez Alvarez S. et al. The role of smartwatch technology in the provision of care for type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus or gestational diabetes: systematic review //JMIR mHealth and uHealth. – 2024. – Vol. 12. – С. e54826. DOI: 10.2196/54826
45. Ferguson T., Olds T., Curtis R. et al. Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses // Lancet Digit Health. – 2022. – Vol. 4. 8. – P. e615–e626. DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00111-x.
46. Yen H.-Y., Huang W.-H. The efficacy of commercial smartwatches with a blood pressure-monitoring feature: A pilot randomized controlled trial // J Nurs Scholarship. – 2022. – Vol. 54, № 3. – P. 324–331. DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12740.
47. Chandrasekaran R., Katthula V., Moustakas E. Patterns of use and key predictors for the use of wearable health care devices by US adults: insights from a national survey // J Med Internet Res. – 2020. – Vol. 22, № 10. – P. e22443. DOI: 10.2196/22443.
48. Ching K. W., Singh M. M. Wearable technology devices security and privacy vulnerability analysis // Int J Netw Secur Appl. – 2016. – Vol. 8, № 3. – P. 19–30. DOI: 10.5121/ijnsa.2016.8302.
49. Zhang D., Wang W., Li F. Association between resting heart rate and coronary artery disease, stroke, sudden death and noncardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis // Can. Med. Assoc. J. – 2016. – Vol. 188, № 15. – P. E384–E392. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.160050
50. Fox K. et al. Heart rate as a prognostic risk factor in patients with coronary artery disease and leftventricular systolic dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL): a subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial // Lancet. – 2008. – Vol. 372, № 9641. – P. 817–821. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61171-X
51. Singh N. et al. Heart rate variability: an old metric with new meaning in the era of using mHealth technologies for Health and Exercise Training Guidance. Part Two: Prognosis and Training // Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. Rev. – 2018. – Vol. 7, № 4. – P. 247–255. DOI: 10.15420/aer.2018.30.2
52. Abbasi J. Using Smartwatch Data to Detect COVID-19 Cases Early // JAMA. – 2020. – Vol. 324, № 22. – P. 2245. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.23696.
53. Elbey M. A. et al. Diagnostic Utility of Smartwatch Technology for Atrial Fibrillation Detection–A Systematic Analysis //Journal of Atrial Fibrillation. – 2021. – Vol. 13. – № 6. – С. 20200446.
54. Moshawrab M., Adda M., Bouzouane A. et al. Smart wearables for the detection of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic literature review // Sensors. – 2023. – Vol. 23, № 2. – P. 828. DOI: 10.3390/S23020828.
55. Mizuno A., Changolkar S., Patel M. S. Wearable devices to monitor and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and opportunities // Annu Rev Med. – 2021. – Vol. 72. – P. 459–471. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-050919-031534
56. Perez M. V. et al. Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation // N. Engl. J. Med. – 2019. – Vol. 381, № 20. – P. 1909–1917. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901183
57. Tison G. H. et al. Passive detection of atrial fibrillation using a commercially available smartwatch // JAMA Cardiol. – 2018. – Vol. 3, № 5. – P. 409–416. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0136
58. Fan Y. Y. et al. Diagnostic performance of a smart device with photoplethysmography technology for atrial fibrillation detection: pilot study (Pre-mAFA II registry) // JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. – 2019. – Vol. 7, № 6. – P. e11437. DOI: 10.2196/11437
59. Гома Т. В. Телеметрический контроль электрокадирограммы у пациента после радиочастотной аблации персестирующей фибрилляции предсердий в сочетании с операцией коронарного шунтирования // Байкальский медицинский журнал. – 2025. – Vol. 4, № 1. – С. 18-28. DOI: 10.57256/2949-0715-2025-4-1-18-28
60. Nazarian S. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of smartwatches for the detection of cardiac arrhythmia: systematic review and meta-analysis // Journal of medical Internet research. – 2021. – Vol. 23, № 8. – P. e28974. DOI: 10.2196/28974
61. Barrera N. et al. Accuracy of Smartwatches in the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis // JACC: Advances. – 2025. – Vol. 4, № 4. – P. 102133. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102133
62. Rosman L., Gehi A., Lampert R. When smartwatches contribute to health anxiety in patients with atrial fibrillation // Cardiovasc Digit Health J. – 2020. – Vol. 1, № 1. – P. 9–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.06.004.
63. Mattison G. et al. A step in the right direction: the potential role of smartwatches in supporting chronic disease prevention in health care // Med J Aust. – 2023. – Vol. 218, № 9. – P. 391–393. DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51920
64. Miller D. J., Sargent C., Roach G. D. A Validation of Six Wearable Devices for Estimating Sleep, Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Adults // Sensors. – 2022. – Vol. 22, № 16. – P. 6317. DOI: 10.3390/s22166317.
65. Асеева И. А. Искусственный интеллект и большие данные: этические проблемы практического использования. (аналитический обзор) //Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 8, Науковедение: Реферативный журнал. – 2022. – № 2. – С. 89-98.
66. Lu J. K., Wang W., Goh J., Maier A. B. Selecting wearable devices to measure cardiovascular functions in community-dwelling adults: application of a practical guide for device selection // Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. – 2025. – Vol. 3, № 2. – P. 100202. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100202.
67. Bayoumy K., Gaber M., Elshafeey A. et al. Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: where we are and how to move forward // Nat Rev Cardiol. – 2021. – Vol. 18. – P. 581–599. DOI: 10.1038/s41569-021-00522-7.
