Generation of phase shift maps for subsurface inclusions in a nanocomposite to train machine learning models in atomic force microscopy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7242/1999-6691/2026.19.3.25Keywords:
atomic force microscopy, phase portrait, dissipative losses, styrene-butadiene rubber, nanocomposite, machine learning, finite element modelingAbstract
Quality control of nanofiller distribution (carbon nanotubes, carbon black) is crucial for the properties of polymer nanocomposites. The existing methods of atomic force microscopy (AFM) allow for indirect assessment of the distribution via two-dimensional phase contrast maps, whereas more accurate three-dimensional techniques require either lengthy experiments or resource-intensive finite element (FE) modeling, which limits their practical application. This paper presents an approach to creating a synthetic dataset that will eventually allow the use of machine learning methods for accelerating the reconstruction of filler distribution patterns based on AFM phase-contrast data. The generation of a synthetic database for training the neural network is accomplished in the MATLAB environment and involves the variation of key parameters: particle geometry and depth, probe shape, and elastic and surface-energy properties of the materials. Data acquisition requires calculating the relationship between the particle depth and the phase shift determined by the tapping-mode AFM technique. The generated dataset reveals a direct correlation between the surface phase portraits (the standard tapping-mode AFM output signal) and the three-dimensional distribution of inclusions in the subsurface layer. The study demonstrates the influence of geometric parameters (particle radius, depth, probe radius) on the quality and appearance of theoretical dissipation maps. It has been found that there is a nonlinear relationship between the depth of the filler particles and the dissipative losses causing a phase shift, which makes it possible to eliminate the ambiguities during the reconstruction of the structure. The obtained results open possibilities for rapid quantitative analysis of nanocomposites and, in the longer term, for consideration of more complex filler morphologies (agglomerates, chain-like structures).
Downloads
References
Anczykowski B., Gotsmann B., Fuchs H., Cleveland J.P., Elings V.B. How to measure energy dissipation in dynamic mode atomic force microscopy. Applied Surface Science. 1999. Vol. 140, no. 3/4. P. 376–382. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(98)00558-3
Garcia R., Gómez C.J., Martinez N.F., Patil S., Dietz C., Magerle R. Identification of Nanoscale Dissipation Processes by Dynamic Atomic Force Microscopy. Physical Review Letters. 2006. Vol. 97, no. 1. 016103. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.016103
Schröter K., Petzold A., Henze T., Thurn-Albrecht T. Quantitative Analysis of Scanning Force Microscopy Data Using Harmonic Models. Macromolecules. 2009. Vol. 42, no. 4. P. 1114–1124. DOI: 10.1021/ma8024464
Spitzner E.-C., Riesch C., Magerle R. Subsurface Imaging of Soft Polymeric Materials with Nanoscale Resolution. ACS Nano. 2011. Vol. 5, no. 1. P. 315–320. DOI: 10.1021/nn1027278
Iziumov R.I., Svistkov A.L. Nanometer-scale Bodies Mechanical Interaction Mathematical Model. Bulletin of Perm University. Mathematics. Mechanics. Computer Science. 2024. No. 4. P. 35–45. DOI: 10.17072/1993-0550-2024-4-35-45
Paruchuri A., Wang Y., Gu X., Jayaraman A. Machine Learning for Analyzing Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) Images Generated from Polymer Blends. Digital Discovery. 2024. Vol. 3, no. 12. P. 2533–2550. DOI: 10.1039/d4dd00215f
Morozov I.A., Izyumov R.I., Beliaev A.Y. AFM Indentation and Machine Learning in Analysis of Filler Distribution in Rubber. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2026. Vol. 143, no. 13. e70370. DOI: 10.1002/app.70370
Thiem J., Cole D.P., Dubey U., Srivastava A., Ashraf C., Henry T.C., Bakis C.E., Vashisth A. Using data science to locate nanoparticles in a polymer matrix composite. Composites Science and Technology. 2022. Vol. 218. 109205. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109205
Ghasemi H., Yazdani H. Atomistic simulation and machine learning predictions of mechanical response in nanotube-polymer composites considering filler morphology and aggregation. Computational Materials Science. 2025. Vol. 246. 113399. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113399
Izyumov R.I., Svistkov A.L. Theoretical basis and experimental application of the dissipative properties analysis method for mapping particle distribution in the subsurface layer of elastomeric nanocomposites. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2026. Vol. 341. 114298. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2026.114298
Derjaguin B., Muller V., Toporov Y. Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1975. Vol. 53, no. 2. P. 314–326. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1
Johnson K.L., Kendall K., Roberts A.D. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 1971. Vol. 324, no. 1558. P. 301–313. DOI: 10.1098/RSPA.1971.0141
Onozuka N., Nakajima K. Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of Velocity Dependent Adhesive Viscoelastic Contact. Langmuir. 2024. Vol. 40, no. 46. P. 24565–24575. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c03370
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Computational Continuum Mechanics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.